Can you afford not to invest in Enterprise Configuration Management?

‍

Be honest with yourself and your organization: Does your organization rely on firefighting and corrective actions today? Do you have many inefficiencies that negatively impact the innovative ability of your organization? Do you have issues with delivering quality products and struggle to keep customer trust?

If so, you are basically at a crossroads. To the left is path A, a familiar path: patchwork systems, siloed departments, last-minute scrambles to fix issues that could have been avoided. It is what you’re used to, and it works, right?

To the right is path B, a lesser-known but transformative route: Enterprise Configuration Management (ECM).

Enterprise Configuration Management

ECM is not only focused on managing product configurations, like traditional CM, but is a holistic approach to managing all configuration information, including that of your organization. Your organization is also a configuration of different departments, groups, processes, procedures, etc.  How can you get your product configurations under control when your business is out of control?

Now let’s have a look at these 2 paths:

Path A: Business-as-Usual (Ignorance is bliss)

When hiking on a beautiful day, ignoring the weather forecasts or the thunderclouds starting to cover the blue sky will likely result in you getting soaked by the rain or, worse, being swept away in a mudslide or hit by lightning. Being prepared requires a small investment, such as packing appropriate gear or having a place to take shelter along your route, and can go a long way.

‍

‍

This is analogous to choosing not to invest strategically in robust, enterprise-wide CM and might feel like saving money or avoiding complexity. In reality, it’s often an unconscious acceptance of significant, ongoing hidden costs and escalating risks. This path typically looks like:

• 🚧 Siloed Efforts: Where there is a lack of collaboration or integration. Misalignment between Engineering, Manufacturing, and Service. Changes are perceived as slow and cumbersome.
• 🔄 Constant rework and change churn: Teams constantly scramble to fix issues arising from configuration issues – incorrect parts used, incompatible software deployed, outdated procedures followed. This consumes valuable resources that could be driving innovation. A significant portion of your organization’s effort goes into rework and managing the fallout from uncontrolled changes. This waste is often unmeasured but substantial. On average, companies spend about 17 – 27 % of their revenue on corrective actions*.
• 📃 Processes not well documented: When processes are not well documented, the organization relies on tribal knowledge. This will result in ad hoc ways of working that are difficult to measure and/or improve. How can your product be of high quality if your ways of working are undocumented and uncontrolled?
• 🕵️♂️ Lack of Traceability: When documentation doesn’t match reality (“as-built” vs “as-designed”), decision-making becomes based on guesswork. How can you plan effectively or assure compliance if you don’t trust your configuration information? Before investing in proper configuration management, a manufacturing company had issues with the quality of its data relevant to customer support. 70% of the data had inconsistencies, basically rendering the entire dataset useless.

The Business Consequences of Path A: Ignorance is Bliss till it isn’t

• 📉 Financial Drain: Due to increased scrap and rework, higher warranty costs, expensive product recalls, potential fines for non-compliance, budget overruns due to unforeseen integration issues, and lost revenue from delayed launches.
• 🦥 Operational Drag: Inconsistent product quality, unreliable service delivery, slower time-to-market, integration failures between systems or components, and immense difficulty implementing complex changes or scaling operations.
• 🫸 Strategic Limitation: Stifled innovation capacity (resources tied up in fixing vs. designing and producing), increased vulnerability to security threats, difficulty meeting evolving regulatory demands, and ultimately, a loss of competitive edge against more agile, controlled competitors.

Choosing Path A isn’t saving money; it’s accumulating operational debt and accepting preventable risks, creating a negatively compounding impact on your ability to deliver value to your customers.

Path B: Strategic Investment in Enterprise Configuration Management

Taking this path means you start your hike being prepared. This path involves a conscious decision to treat Enterprise Configuration Management (ECM) as a critical supporting business capability, investing in the processes, tools, and culture to achieve enterprise-wide control and visibility. A mature approach often involves implementing principles like those found in CM2.

ECM exists to support organizations to stay in business and help fulfill their purpose by avoiding costs, preventing delays, and making risks visible.

To achieve this, ECM per CM2 manages all configuration-relevant information that could impact safety, security, quality, schedule, cost, profit, the environment, corporate reputation, or brand recognition and has processes in place that:

• accommodate fast& efficient change
• ensure documentation remains clear, concise, and valid
• guards the integrity of the configuration information
• streamline communication & collaboration across functions & company borders
• continually improve these practices

‍

CM2 isn’t just documentation or another process. It’s a holistic, enterprise-wide model designed to ensure integrity across the enterprise. Key tenets include:

• 💯 Clear, Concise, and Valid Requirements: Establishing unambiguous, validated requirements first as the foundation for everything that follows. If you can’t define it clearly, you can’t control it effectively.
• ↔️ Enterprise-Wide Integration: Breaking down the silos. CM2 provides a common framework and language connecting R&D, Engineering, IT, Manufacturing, Supply Chain, Quality, and even supporting functions. It ensures everyone works from the same, accurate information.
• 🔁 Closed-Loop Change Management: Implementing a single structured but flexible change process where changes are properly requested, assessed for enterprise-wide impact, approved, implemented, and verified to ensure they achieved the intended outcome without negative side effects. No longer fire-and-forget changes, which are thrown over the wall to manufacturing without proper alignment. Companies that implemented the CM2 Change process report significant improvements, doubling or even tripling the number of changes they were able to process.
• 🧾 Accurate Configuration Accountability: Maintaining a trustworthy “single source of truth” where the documented configuration reliably matches the actual physical or digital reality. This builds trust and enables reliable data-driven decisions.

With ECM, you turn data chaos into digital confidence. You empower teams to innovate without fear. You ensure that every product, part, and process is aligned from concept to sustainment.

The Business Outcomes of Path B:

• 📈 Financial Gains: Significant reduction in costs associated with errors, rework, recalls, and compliance failures. More predictable project budgets and timelines. Demonstrable ROI is often realized within 1-3 years.
• 🙏 Operational Excellence: Streamlined processes, improved product/service consistency, quality, and output, accelerated time-to-market through parallel work and reduced friction, enhanced system reliability, and inherent audit readiness.
• 🚀 Strategic Enablement: Increased capacity for innovation as people are freed from firefighting. Improved agility to respond to market changes. Robust risk mitigation (compliance, security, operational). Scalable operations ready for growth. Competitive advantage through superior execution and reliability.

Choosing Path B is an investment in the fundamental stability, efficiency, and future-readiness of your organization. It changes how you perceive CM; instead of a necessary evil, you will see it as a strategic advantage.

So, before you invest in your next ERP or PLM project failure and go all in on AI, consider Enterprise Configuration Management as a foundation for building the future of your organization. You should not invest in Enterprise CM solely to mitigate risk; instead, you should embrace Enterprise CM as a means to elevate the innovation capacity of your organization to new heights.

The question isn’t: Can we afford to invest in Configuration Management? The real question is:

Can we afford not to?

Opportunity costs are real and need to be accounted for when making such a decision. Missing the bus could create a ripple effect. You also miss your connecting train, and therefore, you miss your flight, and as a result, you’re stranded.

It’s not about your organization’s ability to serve your customers today or tomorrow or about the results of the next quarter, but whether you can serve your customers and keep up with their demands in 5 or 10 years from now. If your future depends on strategic clarity, ECM isn’t optional. It’s foundational.

What do you think? Can you afford not to invest in ECM?

Ready to go deeper?

Use code Martijn10 for 10% off training—and don’t forget to tell them Martijn sent you 😉.

* S. Mahmood and N.I. Kureshi – Journal of Quality and Technology Management – Volume XI, Issue I, June 2015

Copyrights by the Institute for Process Excellence

This article was originally published on ipxhq.com & mdux.net.

‍