CM Maturity: CM Processes Create Flow!

February 17, 2026

Martijn Dullaart

Community Voice

Do you have mature CM processes that actually work across the entire lifecycle?

Because CM process maturity isn’t about having procedures on SharePoint. It’s about whether the process is consistently defined, applied, measured, and continually improved, and enables the changing needs of an organization.

👉 Takeaway:
If your CM process is not standardized, adaptable, compliant, and pragmatic, maturity will remain a paper exercise.

Start with the foundation.
A mature CM organization has documented, validated, and released CM processes under formal change control and accessible to all stakeholders. That process is explicitly based on recognized standards such as CM2 and SAE-EIA-649.

But maturity doesn’t stop at documentation.

The CM process must be defined in a way that:

  • Accommodates product and project lifecycle differences
  • Preserves company-wide CM principles
  • Applies consistently to products, facilities, and even administrative information from single sources of truth
  • Uses KPIs to monitor performance and guide continual improvement

Where many organizations struggle is with application at scale. True process maturity means CM is applied:

  • Across all lifecycle phases — from concept to decommission
  • To products and facilities
  • To CM itself, including changes to CM strategy, processes, and documentation
  • With measurable success, supported by defined KPIs

Then comes the heart of CM discipline, closed-loop change traceability. Mature processes are clearly defined:

  • Ownership of configuration information
  • Closed-loop change traceability for all configuration information
  • Embedded customer and supplier involvement when required
  • Transparent status accounting (as-designed, as-built, as-maintained, etc.)

And yes, the classic CM pillars still matter:

  • Configuration Planning with clear maturity expectations
  • Configuration Identification with naming, numbering, baselining, traceability, and Model-Based Engineering support
  • Change Management with impact analysis, governance, and differentiated change tracks
  • Status Accounting that reflects reality, not intent
  • Verification and configuration audits before release to customers

A CM process is only mature if it survives complexity, change, and scale.

Not because it’s rigid, but because it’s well-governed, measurable, flexible, fit for purpose, and continually improved.

👉 Where does your CM process struggle most today: definition, application, or measurement?

Ready to go deeper?

Use code Martijn10 for 10% off training—and don’t forget to tell them Martijn sent you 😉.

Copyrights by the Institute for Process Excellence

This article was originally published on ipxhq.com & mdux.net.

Go to the Perspectives Page

About the Author

Known by his blog moniker MDUX—Martijn is a leading voice in enterprise configuration management and product lifecycle strategy. With over two decades of experience, he blends technical depth with practical insight, championing CM2 principles to drive operational excellence across industries. Through his blog MDUX:The Future of CM, his newsletter, and contributions to platforms like IpX, Martijn has cultivated a vibrant community of professionals by demystifying complex topics like baselines, scalability, and traceability. His writing is known for its clarity, relevance, and ability to spark meaningful dialogue around the evolving role of configuration management in Industry 4.0.

ALWAYS EVOLVE WITH IPX
Follow us
on Linked