January 20, 2026
Community Voice
.png)

Teams often believe that releasing documents early and frequently will compensate for slow cycle times. This approach assumes that releasing drawings or instructions ahead of schedule will yield results. In practice, it creates rework, version confusion, and unnecessary churn in configuration management. Why?
Implementation is often reactive rather than adhering to planned timelines, causing execution delays that make released documents less relevant and early releases obsolete before use.
Weak Change Authority governance leads to ad hoc changes, reactive problem-solving, rework, and diminished trust in configuration management.
Without clear effectivity (date, event, unit, lot) for a change, you’re flying blind. Effectivity is a core CM mechanism to avoid chaos.
Frequent changes in planning and manufacturing data, along with a lack of ownership, make controlled document release nearly impossible, resulting in documents being released into a moving target.
When formal release processes are slow, individuals often use informal shortcuts like treats, emails, or side conversations to speed things up. While this seems efficient, it compromises traceability and the purpose of configuration management.
When deviations become the norm, people avoid structured change control. Instead of fixing the underlying process issues, exceptions accumulate until they become too much to handle.
In a successful project, documents are released on time, aligned with key milestones. Each revision is relevant upon release, reducing rework. Change Authority functions as intended, effectivity is well defined, and informal workarounds are avoided.
When we look at why we act the way we do, not just what we should do, we can achieve real configuration control.
Check out the other How Do YOU CM2? posts.
Use code Martijn10 for 10% off training—and don’t forget to tell them Martijn sent you 😉.
Copyrights by the Institute for Process Excellence
This article was originally published on ipxhq.com & mdux.net.

Known by his blog moniker MDUX—Martijn is a leading voice in enterprise configuration management and product lifecycle strategy. With over two decades of experience, he blends technical depth with practical insight, championing CM2 principles to drive operational excellence across industries. Through his blog MDUX:The Future of CM, his newsletter, and contributions to platforms like IpX, Martijn has cultivated a vibrant community of professionals by demystifying complex topics like baselines, scalability, and traceability. His writing is known for its clarity, relevance, and ability to spark meaningful dialogue around the evolving role of configuration management in Industry 4.0.